Autism and Sketchy Science

It’s no secret that autism concerns are part of the genesis of vaccine skepticism.  The story of Dr. Andrew Wakefield is well-known and well-documented.  His reports, combined with a general ignorance of scientific method and clinical trials, created a perfect storm that set back public health for a generation or so.

Emotionally, I would like to see him held responsible for his misdeeds.  But in the end, I can’t sanction criminal prosecution merely for publishing his “research.”  Dr. Wakefield is entitled to a great degree of free speech in this country. The rest of us have to sort out his claims.  And that leads me to the story of Dr. Stephanie Seneff.

Dr. Seneff is an MIT-educated electrical engineer who is no doubt a math whiz.  And she has taken it upon herself to claim that glyphosate, the active ingredient in Roundup® herbicide, is responsible for the increase in autism cases in the US.  Here’s a picture of the dastardly “pesticide”

620px-Glyphosate.svg

Looks evil enough, right?  But this is one of the greatest herbicides ever invented and is a major reason genetically modified plants can be used in agriculture.  It’s considered essentially non-toxic to human beings, but kills plants efficiently.  But that word “non-toxic” is loaded.  Toxicology is a science unto itself and is subtle.  I’ll get to that in another post.

Perhaps over-simplistically summarized, Dr. Seneff’s argument is that glyphosate antagonizes the enzyme 5-enolpyruvylshikimate-3-phosphate synthase (EPSPS), present in plants but not in humans. Dr. Seneff claims EPSPS is present in many human gut bacteria, and this bacteria is inhibited or killed upon eating plants treated with glyphosate.  As such, bacteria colonies in our guts are upset, leading to alterations in essential amino acid production, which in turn is linked to autism.  Dr. Seneff has produced a multitude of powerpoint presentations on this.  One of the key pieces of evidence is a graph indicating a statistically airtight correlation between the increased rate of autism and an increase in glyphosate application in agriculture.  That seems solid right?

Not so fast.  While tantalizingly attractive, a graph does not indicate causation.  One of the fundamental rules of toxicology is that toxicity is a function of dose.  I haven’t seen any controlled dose-related studies she or fellow researchers have conducted that have been subjected to peer review.  I guess I’d ask how do human gut bacteria react to the doses of glyphosate found in human food?  And regarding the second part of the assertion, what amino acids, or lack thereof, correlate with an increased chance of autism?  I’ve never heard what those are, nor have I ever, ever heard of an obstetrician, GP, or internist recommending additional doses to an expectant mother, tiny infant etc.  So the entire claim is mystifying to me.

I think her conclusions are attractive to many for the same reason Dr. Wakefield’s were.  Nobody wants a child with autism.  But many parents bear the terrible burden of raising and caring for one.  We want to find and stop “autism” whatever the source, because the burden is so unbearable.  And those children and parents deserve and need our care and support.

There is no short cut to finding answers to hard questions.  It is creativity, patience, hard work, and public debate.  Pay attention to those whose work is reviewed and undramatically debated.  That way, we may actually find a “cure” for autism.

Advertisements

About patlowder

I'm a chemist, patent attorney, husband of one wife, dad of two sons, and I am (a progressive, whatever that label implies) Christian. I have had a rich, varied life and I give thanks for it. Just to be clear, this blog reflects personal views and is not intended as an advertisement for legal services, or should be considered a "law blog." You should not take anything I say to be a legal opinion on any topic and you don't create an attorney-client relationship by reading it. That requires an executed written contract.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

7 Responses to Autism and Sketchy Science

  1. Gene says:

    Very accurate! I think I shared with you a post from a blogger who established a linear (high r^2) correlation between sales of organic food and the incidence of autism. Following Dr. Seneff’s logic on the relationship between correlation and causation, one could safely say that consumption of organic food is the main cause of autism. Now, I digress, but do we have an unambiguous definition of organic food? I certainly know that there isn’t one for autism. Hey, I just found another relationship between autism and organic foods: no one knows what they are.

  2. Carolyn says:

    Read the article about Dr. Seneff today. That level of correlation certainly gives incentive for further study. Any thing out there on whether a similar effect is found in animals exposed to glyphosate?

    • patlowder says:

      I have never seen anything. But roundup-ready corn treated with glyphosate is fed to cows by the kilotons. If the cows are made autistic, I don’t exactly know how one figures that out. Plus, I don’t think cow gut bacteria and human gut bacteria are the same. Otherwise, I would just eat hay.

  3. Susan Ozmore says:

    Excellent. My first thought when reading about the correlation was what other factors were controlled. For example, I imagine smart phone usage has gone up over the same period of time, as have other things in our rapidly changing world. Thanks for an excellent post Patrick.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s